Should You Use PCT After 25 Years Of Steroid Use?
Timeline
Video Summary
A 65-year-old man asks whether PCT makes sense after 25 years of anabolic steroid use. Dr. O’Connor questions whether attempting to restart natural testosterone production at this stage is worthwhile and instead shifts attention toward protecting the heart, kidneys, prostate, and blood health.
The member reports high red blood cells, elevated creatinine, and a slightly enlarged prostate after cycles averaging approximately 1,200 mg per week. Dr. O’Connor explains that elevated red blood cell measurements can contribute to hypercoagulability and clotting risk and emphasizes that CBC results should be interpreted with ferritin and the broader clinical picture.
Rather than focusing primarily on Clomid and PCT, Dr. O’Connor recommends concentrating on the ABCDs™, especially blood pressure, cholesterol, metabolic health, and red blood cell and iron status. He raises the possibility that sustainable TRT may be more practical than repeated cycling and recovery attempts after decades of anabolic steroid exposure.
Drug Callouts
Condition Callouts
Key Takeaways
- After 25 years of anabolic steroid use, Dr. O’Connor questions whether PCT at age 65 is the most practical goal.
- High red blood cell measurements should be evaluated with ferritin and the broader clotting and cardiovascular risk profile.
- Blood pressure becomes a major priority in an older man with decades of testosterone and anabolic steroid exposure.
- Heart, kidney, prostate, cholesterol, metabolic, and blood health should take priority over simply trying to restart natural testosterone production.
- A sustainable TRT regimen may be more practical than repeated cycling and post-cycle therapy after decades of androgen suppression.